CAEP logo

 

Call for Comments

Governors State University College of Education and Human Development is hosting an accreditation visit by the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) on April 23, 2025. Interested parties are invited to submit third-party comments to the evaluation team. Please note that comments must address substantive matters related to the quality of professional education programs offered, and should specify the party's relationship to the provider (i.e., graduate, present or former faculty member, employer of graduates).

We invite you to submit written testimony to:

CAEP
1140 19th Street NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036
Or by email to: callforcomments@caepnet.org

Accreditation Information

The Educator Preparation Provider (EPP) at Governors State University (GSU) is continuously accredited by CAEP, formerly the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). The CAEP Accreditation Council found that GSU met all five of the national standards for educator preparation.  This accreditation is recognized by the Illinois State Board of Education.

The Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) announced on November 12, 2019 that Governors State University is one of 59 providers from 24 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico to receive accreditation for their educator preparation programs. The fall 2019 review by the CAEP Accreditation Council resulted in 59 newly-accredited EPPs, bringing the total to 281 providers approved under the CAEP Teacher Preparation Standards – rigorous, nationally recognized standards that were developed to ensure excellence in educator preparation programs.

CAEP is the sole nationally recognized accrediting body for educator preparation. Accreditation is a nongovernmental activity based on peer review that serves the dual functions of assuring quality and promoting improvement. CAEP was created by the consolidation of the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education and the Teacher Education Accreditation Council. It is a unified accreditation system intent on raising the performance of all institutions focused on educator preparation. Approximately, 800 educator preparation providers participate in the CAEP Accreditation system, including some previously accredited through former standards.

Educator preparation providers (EPPs) seeking accreditation must pass peer review on five standards, which are based on two principles:

  • • Solid evidence that the provider’s graduates are competent and caring educators

  • • Solid evidence that the provider’s educator staff have the capacity to create a culture of evidence and use it to maintain and enhance the quality of the professional programs they offer.

  • Accreditation Approval

    +

    ISBE approved, CAEP accredited. Click here for more information.

  • CAEP Accreditation 2019 Reports

    +
  • CAEP 2025 Programs

    +

    Initial Licensure Programs:

    Early Childhood

    Elementary

    Secondary Biology, B.S.

    Secondary Biology, Post-Bac

    Secondary Chemistry, B.S.

    Secondary Chemistry, Post-Bac 

    Secondary English, B.A.

    Secondary English, Post-Bac

    Secondary Mathematics, B.A.

    Secondary Mathematics, Post-Bac

    Secondary Mathematics, M.S.

    Secondary Social Science, B.A.

    Secondary Social Science, Post-Bac

    Special Education, M.A.

    Advanced Programs:

    Educational Administration - Principal Preparation, M.A.

  • CAEP 2025 Measure 1: Completer Effectiveness (R4.1)

    +

    2024 ISBE APR Report: 2023 Program Data – Demonstrated Teaching Skills

    Candidate Performance as a Classroom Teacher

    The demonstrated teaching skills and impact on K-12 students report visualizes the performance evaluations of candidates who have completed a program at the institution and are employed in an Illinois public school. 

    Overall, GovSt completers are rated at Proficient or Excellent by their employer. A major focus has been to enhance partnerships with school districts to increase the number of mentors for candidates throughout their educator preparation programs. 

    ProgramNeeds improvementProficientExcellent% Proficient and Excellent
    Secondary English Language Arts11166%
    Secondary Mathematics1 150%
    Early Childhood 4266/%
    Elementary221392%
    Special Education 3 100%

    2024 ISBE APR Report: 2023 Program Data – Demonstrated Intervention and Leading Skills
    Advanced degree programs leading to initial licensure as school support personnel or school/district leadership are evaluated on performance. 
    School (principal) and district (superintendent) leadership programs combined demonstrate a 92% proficient+excellent rating. 
    ProgramUnsatis-factoryNeeds improvementProficientExcellent% Proficient and Excellent
    Principal  46100%
    Superintendent1 2 66%

  • CAEP 2025 Measure 2: Satisfaction of employers and stakeholder involvement. (R4.2|R5.3|RA4.1)

    +

    The Employer Satisfaction Survey for the teachers is aligned to the Danielson Rubric, which is designed on a 4-point scale, ranging Unsatisfactory - Excellent. The results below show that 100% of first year completers performed excellent or proficient on holding high expectations for all learners (Danielson 2b), classroom organization and management (Danielson 2e), interpersonal relationships with students (Danielson 2a), and ability to work with diverse P-12 students and their families (Danielson 1b).  Areas for growth include ability to assess student learning including formative and summative assessments (Danielson 1f) and ability to monitor student learning and adjust instruction to meet student learning needs (Danielson 3e), indicating a need to enhance preparation methods for designing assessments and adjusting instruction based on assessment.  


    First Years Teaching Impact Survey by Administrator CAEP 4.1       
    Please rate the GovState prepared teacher (identified in the email) performance as a first-year teacher based on the Standards below.
     ExcellentProficientNeeds ImprovementTotal% Prof + ExcWeighted Average
    Ability to plan, including long-range and short-range plans. (Danielson 1e)50.00%333.33%216.67%1683%3.33
    Ability to assess student learning, including formative and summative assessments. (Danielson 1f)50.00%316.67%133.33%2667%3.17
    Holding high expectations for all learners. (Danielson 2b)66.67%433.33%20.00%06100%3.67
    Knowledge of content and management of instructional time in the classroom. (Danielson 2c)50.00%333.33%216.67%1683%3.33
    Ability to monitor student learning and adjust instruction to meet student learning needs. (Danielson 3e)50.00%316.67%133.33%2667%3.17
    Classroom organization and management. (Danielson 2e)40.00%260.00%30.00%05100%3.4
    Personal and professional development. (Danielson 4e)66.67%416.67%116.67%1683%3.5
    Interpersonal relationships with students. (Danielson 2a)66.67%433.33%20.00%06100%3.67
    Reflective decision-making based on student performance. (Danielson 4a)50.00%333.33%216.67%1683%3.33
    Ability to work with diverse P-12 students and their families. (Danielson 1b)66.67%433.33%20.00%06100%3.67
    Collaboration with peers and administration. (Danielson 4b)50.00%333.33%216.67%1683%3.33
    Ability to impact student learning as evidenced by student data.50.00%333.33%216.67%1683%3.33

  • CAEP 2025 Measure 3: Candidate competency at completion. (R3.3)

    +

    2024 ISBE ILTS Content Test Data Program Year 2023-2024

    The Knowledge and Skills for Teaching domain measured by ISBE evaluates how well candidates perform on state teaching assessments and how well candidates believe their program has prepared them for the classroom. This domain provides the most direct evidence that programs are equipping candidates who complete the program with the knowledge of their teaching subjects, an understanding of their role as teachers, and the teaching experience and skill required to be successful with students when they enter the teaching profession.

    The Mastery of Teaching Subjects report visualizes the institution averages and percentages of ILTS content area test scores.

    Applied filters:
    Ranked Attempt is Best Attempt
    Institution is Governors State University
    Program Year is 2024
    Program Group is Teaching
    Program CodeInstitution AverageState AverageProgram NameCount
    ELA250241English Language Arts10
    MATH223229Mathematics11
    SCG3242229Early Childhood Education55
    SCIB253239Science - Biology3
    SSHI230234Social Science - History7

    This chart displays the percentage of candidates who passed a content area exam on their best attempt, the average program scores, and average state scores. 

    Applied filters:
    Ranked Attempt is Best Attempt
    Institution is Governors State University
    Program Year is 2024
    Program Group is Teaching
    Program CodeProgram NameCountInstitution %State %
    ELAEnglish Language Arts1090%54%
    MATHMathematics1127%41%
    SCG3Early Childhood Education5573%31%
    SCIBScience - Biology3100%54%
    SSHISocial Science - History743%49%

    • CAEP 2025 Measure 4: Ability of completer to be hired

      +

      2024 ISBE Annual Report: 2022-23 Program Data -- Contribution to State Needs
      All program completers are eligible for hire upon graduation.  
      Completers with Full-Time Employment: View the number of completers from each program year who found full-time employment in teaching or other educational roles within two years of program completion.
      Considerations: 
      ISBE only collects employment data from the state’s public schools (including charter schools). Completers employed in a non-public or out-of-state school are not included in this report.
      Employment is inclusive of all educational roles requiring a state educator license (excluding substitute teachers). Each year, school districts report all licensed personnel to the State in the Employment Information System (EIS). 
      Applied filters:
      Program Code top 5 by Completer Employed Count
      Program Category is Teaching
      Institution is Governors State University
      Report Year is 2023
      Program CodePublic PlacementNon-Public Placement
      Elementary32 
      English Language Arts6 
      Early Childhood6 
      Special Education4 
      Mathematics3 
      Applied filters:
      Program Category is Teaching
      Institution is Governors State University
      Report Year is 2023
      Report YearTotal Placement %Public Placement %Non-Public Placement %Early Learning Placement %High-Needs Public Placement %
      202388.9%88.9% 100.0%71.4%

      Applied filters:
      Program Code top 5 by Completer Employed High Needs Count
      Program Category is Teaching
      Institution is Governors State University
      Report Year is 2023
      Program CodeHigh Needs Placement
      Elementary26
      English Language Arts6
      Early Childhood4
      Mathematics3
      Special Education2
      Secondary History2

       

      Applied filters:
      Program Code top 5 by Completer Employed Count
      Program Category is Administrative
      Institution is Governors State University
      Report Year is 2023
      Program CodePublic PlacementNon-Public Placement
      PRIN251
      SUPT1 


      Applied filters:
      Program Category is Administrative
      Institution is Governors State University
      Report Year is 2023
      Report YearTotal Placement %Public Placement %Non-Public Placement %Early Learning Placement %High-Needs Public Placement %
      2023100.0%96.3%3.7% 63.0%


      Applied filters:
      Program Code top 5 by Completer Employed High Needs Count
      Program Category is Administrative
      Institution is Governors State University
      Report Year is 2023
      Program CodeHigh Needs Placement
      PRIN16
      SUPT1

    • CAEP 2023 Annual Report

      +

      The Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP), the accrediting body for Governors State University’s Education Preparation Provider Unit (EPPU), requires EPPUs to disseminate information on the CAEP Accountability Measures (for CHEA Requirements) for the following programs:

      Initial Licensure Programs:

      Early Childhood

      Elementary

      Secondary Biology BA

      Secondary Biology PB

      Secondary Chemistry BA 

      Secondary Chemistry PB 

      Secondary English/Language Arts BA

      Secondary English/Language Arts PB

      Secondary Mathematics BA

      Secondary Mathematics PB

      Secondary Mathematics MS

      Secondary Social Science BA

      Secondary Social Science PB

      Special Education

      Advanced Programs:

      Educational Administration - Principal Preparation

      Interdisciplinary Leadership - Superintendent Preparation

      School Psychology

      EPP Advanced Programs Accredited by Other Professional Organizations:

      School Counseling

      School Social Worker

      School Speech Language Pathologist

      • CAEP 2023 Measure 1: Completer Effectiveness (R4.1)


        2021 Data

        The demonstrated teaching skills and impact on K-12 students report visualizes the performance evaluations of completers.

        Candidate Performance as a Classroom Teacher

        The demonstrated teaching skills and impact on K-12 students report visualizes the performance evaluations of candidates who have completed a program at the institution and are employed in an Illinois public school.

        Overall,GSU completers are rated at Proficient or Excellent by their employer.  These data reflect the impact of COVID-19 in AY2020-21 and AY2021-22 in the number of completers whose skills need improvement. A major focus has been to enhance partnerships with school districts to increase the number of mentors for candidates throughout their educator preparation programs.

        Program CodeNeeds improvementProficientExcellent% Proficient and Excellent
        Secondary English Language Arts 34100%
        LBSI Special Education12 66%
        Secondary Mathematics2 133%
        Early Childhood118295%
        Elementary223794%
        Secondary Biology  2 100%
        Secondary Chemistry 21100%

        ISBE APR Report – Demonstrated Intervention and Leading Skills

        Advanced degree programs leading to initial licensure as school support personnel or school/district leadership are evaluated on performance. 

        School (principal) and district (superintendent) leadership programs combined demonstrate a 96% proficient+excellent rating. 

        Program CodeUnsatis-factoryNeeds improvementProficientExcellent% Proficient and Excellent
        School Counseling     
        Speech Language Pathologist  11100%
        School Social Work     
        Principal  1918100%
        Superintendent     
        • CAEP 2023 Measure 2: Satisfaction of employers and stakeholder involvement (R4.2|R5.3|RA4.1)


           

          The Employer Satisfaction Survey for the teachers is aligned to the Danielson Rubric, which is designed on a 4-point scale, ranging Unsatisfactory - Excellent. The results below show candidates during their first year of teaching performed at the levels of excellent on the indicators of classroom management and organization (53.85%), interpersonal relationships with students (53.85%), ability to work with diverse P-12 students and their families (53.85%), and collaboration with peers and administration (61.54%).  The ability to build relationships with students, families, and colleagues can be a predictor of teacher retention.

          First Year Teaching Impact Survey by Administrator
          Please rate the GSU prepared teacher (identified in the email) performance as a first-year teacher based on the Standards below.
          IndicatorsNeeds Improve-mentProficientExcellentTotal% Proficient + ExcellentWeighted Average (4-point scale)
          Ability to plan, including long-range and short-range plans.0.00%053.85%746.15%613100%3.46
          Ability to assess student learning, including formative and summative assessments.7.69%161.54%830.77%41392%3.23
          Holding high expectations for all learners.0.00%053.85%746.15%613100%3.46
          Knowledge of content and management of instructional time in the classroom.0.00%053.85%746.15%613100%3.46
          Ability to monitor student learning and adjust instruction to meet  student learning needs.7.69%146.15%646.15%61392%3.38
          Classroom organization and management.0.00%046.15%653.85%713100%3.54
          Personal and professional development.0.00%061.54%838.46%513100%3.38
          Interpersonal relationships with students.0.00%046.15%653.85%713100%3.54
          Reflective decision-making based on student performance.0.00%053.85%746.15%613100%3.46
          Ability to work with diverse P-12 students and their families.0.00%046.15%653.85%713100%3.54
          Collaboration with peers and administration.0.00%038.46%561.54%813100%3.62
          Ability to impact student learning as evidenced by student data.7.69%153.85%738.46%51392%3.31

          The Employer Survey for the administrators is aligned to the NELP standards for building administrators.  The Survey was designed on a 4-point scale, ranging Unsatisfactory - Excellent.  This survey is sent out 4 years after completion, which is the average time to transition to administration according to Education Week. The demonstrated administrative skills and impact on P-22 students report visualizes the performance of candidates who have completed a program at Governors State University. The results below show that all candidates perform at the Excellent and Proficient levels during their beginning year(s) as an administrator.    

          Administrator Impact Survey by Superintendent 
          Please rate the GSU-prepared administrator (identified in the email) performance as a new administrator based on the Standards below.
          IndicatorsProficientExcellentTotal% Proficient + ExcellentWeighted Average
          The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively evaluate, develop, and communicate a school mission and vision designed to reflect a core set of values and priorities that include data use, technology, equity, diversity, digital citizenship, and community.60.00%340.00%25100%3.4
          The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to reflect on, communicate about, cultivate, and model professional dispositions and norms (i.e., fairness, integrity, transparency, trust, digital citizenship, collaboration, perseverance, reflection, lifelong learning) that support the educational success and well-being of each student and adult.40.00%260.00%35100%3.6
          The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to develop and maintain a supportive, equitable, culturally responsive, and inclusive school culture.20.00%180.00%45100%3.8
          The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to evaluate, develop, and implement coherent systems of curriculum, instruction, data systems, supports, and assessment.40.00%260.00%35100%3.6
          The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to engage families, community, and school personnel in order to strengthen student learning, support school improvement, and advocate for the needs of their school and community.60.00%340.00%25100%3.4
          The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to improve management, communication, technology, school-level governance, and operation systems to develop and improve data-informed and equitable school resource plans and to apply laws, policies, and regulations.40.00%260.00%35100%3.6
          The administrator understands and demonstrates the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to build the school’s professional capacity, engage staff in the development of a collaborative professional culture, and improve systems of staff supervision, evaluation, support, and professional learning.40.00%260.00%35100%3.6
          • CAEP 2023 Measure 3: Candidate competency at completion. (R3.3)

          • The Mastery of Teaching Subjects report visualizes the institution averages and percentages of ILTS content area test scores.

            The Knowledge and Skills for Teaching domain measured by ISBE  evaluates how well candidates perform on state teaching assessments and how well candidates believe their program has prepared them for the classroom.

            This domain provides the most direct evidence that programs are equipping candidates who complete the program with the knowledge of their teaching subjects, an understanding of their role as teachers, and the teaching experience and skill required to be successful with students when they enter the teaching profession.

            This chart displays the percentage of candidates who passed a content area exam on any attempt, the average program scores, and average state scores.

            ProgramMeets CountPossible CountPercentage metDomain Indicator State Minimum StandardDomain Indicator State TargetContent Test GSU Candidate AverageContent Test State Average
            Early Childhood Education829190%80%100%242.3245.9
            Elementary Education9292100%80%100%242.7251.2
            English Language Arts323786%80%100%236253.4
            Learning Behavior Specialist I (LBS I)232592%80%100%254.6261.2
            Mathematics295454%80%100%209247.1
            Science - Biology   80%100%Limited Data Available247.3

            CAEP 2023 Measure 4: Ability of completer to be hired

            -

             

            All program completers are eligible for hire upon graduation.  The AY2020-21 and the fall of 2021 were exceptions due to the COVID pandemic.  Under Gubernatorial Executive Order, candidates were allowed to graduate without passing the content test for licensure. Candidates who graduated without passing the test are not considered completers and, therefore, not represented in the data below. 

            These charts display full time employment in an Illinois public school. 

            2020-21 Initial Licensure Completers Employed in Illinois Public School Districts during 2021-22
            ProgramTotal CompletersPlacedNot Placed
            English Language Arts330
            LBSI220
            Mathematics110
            Early Childhood16106
            Elementary22193
            School Counseling651
            School Language Pathology201010
            School Psychology220

            2018-19 Principal Preparation Completers Employed as Administrators in Illinois Public School Districts during 2021-22
            Total CompletersAdministrative RoleTeacher PositionNot Employed in Illinois Public School
            2812122

               

            •  
        •  ISBE APR Report – Demonstrated Teaching Skills

      • CAEP 2024 Annual Report

        +

        The Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP), the accrediting body for Governors State University’s Education Preparation Provider Unit (EPPU), requires EPPUs to disseminate information on the CAEP Accountability Measures (for CHEA Requirements) for the following programs:

        Initial Licensure Programs:

        Early Childhood

        Elementary

        Secondary Biology, B.S.

        Secondary Biology, Post-Bac

        Secondary Chemistry, B.S.

        Secondary Chemistry, Post-Bac 

        Secondary English, B.A.

        Secondary English, Post-Bac

        Secondary Mathematics, B.A.

        Secondary Mathematics, Post-Bac

        Secondary Mathematics, M.S.

        Secondary Social Science, B.A.

        Secondary Social Science, Post-Bac

        Special Education, M.A.

        Advanced Programs:

        Educational Administration - Principal Preparation, M.A.

        Interdisciplinary Leadership - Superintendent Preparation, Ed.D

        School Psychology, Ed.S.

        EPP Advanced Programs Accredited by Other Professional Organizations:

        School Counseling, M.A.

        School Social Worker, M.S.W.

        School Speech Language Pathologist, M.H.S.

        CAEP 2024 Measure 1: Completer Effectiveness (R4.1)

        2023 ISBE APR Report: 2022 Program Data – Demonstrated Teaching Skills

        Candidate Performance as a Classroom Teacher

        The demonstrated teaching skills and impact on K-12 students report visualizes the performance evaluations of candidates who have completed a program at the institution and are employed in an Illinois public school.  

        Overall, GovSt completers are rated at Proficient or Excellent by their employer.  These data reflect the impact of COVID-19 in AY2020-21 and AY2021-22 in the number of completers whose skills need improvement. A major focus has been to enhance partnerships with school districts to increase the number of mentors for candidates throughout their educator preparation programs. 

        Program CodeNeeds improvementProficientExcellent% Proficient and Excellent
        Secondary English Language Arts 12100%
        LBSI Special Education11 50%
        Secondary Mathematics2  0%
        Early Childhood19292%
        Elementary310588%
        Secondary Biology  2 100%
        Secondary Chemistry 21100%

         2023 ISBE APR Report: 2022 Program Data – Demonstrated Intervention and Leading Skills

        Advanced degree programs leading to initial licensure as school support personnel or school/district leadership are evaluated on performance. 

        School (principal) and district (superintendent) leadership programs combined demonstrate a 96% proficient+excellent rating. 

        Program CodeUnsatis-factoryNeeds improvementProficientExcellent% Proficient and Excellent
        School Counseling     
        Speech Language Pathologist  11100%
        School Social Work     
        Principal  1110100%
        Superintendent1   0%
        Principal + Superintendent1 111095%
         

        CAEP 2024 Measure 2: Satisfaction of employers and stakeholder involvement. (R4.2|R5.3|RA4)

        The Employer Satisfaction Survey for the teachers is aligned to the Danielson Rubric, which is designed on a 4-point scale, ranging Unsatisfactory - Excellent. The results below show candidates during their first year of teaching performed at the levels of excellent or proficient on knowledge of content and management of instructional time (100%) and the ability to plan for the long-range and short-range instructional goals (90%). Interpersonal relationships, classroom organization and management, and ability to impact student learning survey results were below 3.0 in the weighted average, indicating a need to enhance preparation methods for building relationships and buy-in with students for the improvement of classroom management and instructional outcomes.  

        First Year Teaching Impact Survey by Administrator (AY21-22 Completers; AY22-23 First-Year Teachers)  
        Please rate the GovSt prepared teacher (identified in the email) performance as a first-year teacher based on the Standards below.  
        Indicators 
         Unsatis-
        factory

         

        Needs Improve-mentProficientExcellentTotal% Proficient + ExcellentWeighted Average (4-point scale)
        Ability to plan, including long-range and short-range plans.0%010%150%540%41090%3.3
        Ability to assess student learning, including formative and summative assessments.0%020%250%530%31080%3.1
        Holding high expectations for all learners.0%020%240%440%41080%3.2
        Knowledge of content and management of instructional time in the classroom.10%110%150%530%310100%3.0
        Ability to monitor student learning and adjust instruction to meet  student learning needs.0%030%320%250%51070%3.2
        Classroom organization and management.10%130%330%330%31060%2.8
        Personal and professional development.10%110%140%440%41080%3.1
        Interpersonal relationships with students.10%130%320%240%41060%2.9
        Reflective decision-making based on student performance.10%10.00%150%530%31080%3.0
        Ability to work with diverse P-12 students and their families.10%110%140%440%41080%3.1
        Collaboration with peers and administration.10%020%230%350%51080%3.3
        Ability to impact student learning as evidenced by student data.10%1720%250%520%21070%2.8

        The Employer Survey for the administrators is aligned to the NELP standards for building administrators.  The Survey was designed on a 4-point scale, ranging Unsatisfactory - Excellent.  This survey is sent out 4 years after completion, which is the average time to transition to administration according to Education Week. The demonstrated administrative skills and impact on P-22 students report visualizes the performance of candidates who have completed a program at Governors State University. The results below show that all candidates perform at the Excellent and Proficient levels during their beginning year(s) as an administrator.    

        Administrator Impact Survey by Superintendent (AY18-19 Program Completers; AY22-23 Administrators)
        Please rate the GovSt-prepared administrator (identified in the email) performance as a new administrator based on the Standards below.
        IndicatorsProficientExcellentTotal% Proficient + ExcellentWeighted Average
        The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively evaluate, develop, and communicate a school mission and vision designed to reflect a core set of values and priorities that include data use, technology, equity, diversity, digital citizenship, and community.60.00%340.00%25100%3.4
        The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to reflect on, communicate about, cultivate, and model professional dispositions and norms (i.e., fairness, integrity, transparency, trust, digital citizenship, collaboration, perseverance, reflection, lifelong learning) that support the educational success and well-being of each student and adult.40.00%260.00%35100%3.6
        The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to develop and maintain a supportive, equitable, culturally responsive, and inclusive school culture.20.00%180.00%45100%3.8
        The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to evaluate, develop, and implement coherent systems of curriculum, instruction, data systems, supports, and assessment.40.00%260.00%35100%3.6
        The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to engage families, community, and school personnel in order to strengthen student learning, support school improvement, and advocate for the needs of their school and community.60.00%340.00%25100%3.4
        The administrator understands and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to improve management, communication, technology, school-level governance, and operation systems to develop and improve data-informed and equitable school resource plans and to apply laws, policies, and regulations.40.00%260.00%35100%3.6
        The administrator understands and demonstrates the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to build the school’s professional capacity, engage staff in the development of a collaborative professional culture, and improve systems of staff supervision, evaluation, support, and professional learning.40.00%260.00%35100%3.6

        CAEP 2024 Measure 3: Candidate competency at completion. (R3.3)

        2023 ISBE ILTS Content Test Data Program Year 2022-2023

        The Mastery of Teaching Subjects report visualizes the institution averages and percentages of ILTS content area test scores. 

        The Knowledge and Skills for Teaching domain measured by ISBE  evaluates how well candidates perform on state teaching assessments and how well candidates believe their program has prepared them for the classroom.

        This domain provides the most direct evidence that programs are equipping candidates who complete the program with the knowledge of their teaching subjects, an understanding of their role as teachers, and the teaching experience and skill required to be successful with students when they enter the teaching profession.

        This chart displays the percentage of candidates who passed a content area exam on their best attempt, the average program scores, and average state scores.

        ProgramMeets CountPossible CountPercentage metDomain Indicator State Minimum StandardDomain Indicator State TargetTest TakersContent Test GovSt Candidate AverageContent Test State Average
        Early Childhood Education8910585%80%100%
           30
        248242
        Elementary Education6666100%80%100%   4256249
        English Language Arts323591%80%100%
           14
        248242
        Learning Behavior Specialist I (LBS I)***80%100%

            5
        249244
        Mathematics325459%80%100%   16217231
        Science - Biology***80%100%    6247236
        Science - Chemistry***80%100%     2246239

        *Limited data available

        Program NameInstitution AverageState AverageCount
        Principal24925282
        School Counselor2242522
        School Psychologist24724217
        School Social Worker2292561
        Superintendent2492606


        CAEP 2024 Measure 4: Ability of completer to be hired 
        2023 ISBE Annual Report: 2021-22 Program Data -- Contribution to State Needs

        All program completers are eligible for hire upon graduation.  

        Completers with Full-Time Employment: View the number of completers from each program year who found full-time employment in teaching or other educational roles within two years of program completion. 

        Considerations: 

        • ISBE only collects employment data from the state’s public schools (including charter schools). Completers employed in a non-public or out-of-state school are not included in this report.
        • Employment is inclusive of all educational roles requiring a state educator license (excluding substitute teachers). Each year, school districts report all licensed personnel to the State in the Employment Information System (EIS). 
        2020-21 Initial Licensure Completers (First year of employment 2021-22
        ProgramTotal CompletersPlacedNot Placed
        English Language Arts532
        LBSI220
        Mathematics660
        Early Childhood23185
        Elementary29227
        Science - Biology321
        Science - Chemistry220
        School Counseling752
        School Language Pathology532924
        School Psychology13121

        2019-20 Principal Preparation Completers Employed as Administrators in Illinois Public School Districts during 2021-22
        Total CompletersAdministrative RoleTeacher PositionNot Employed in Illinois Public School
        111100